RESEARCH
GENOME - PHENOME - COMMUNITY: WHAT DRIVES DIVERSITY?
My research focuses on understanding how ecological differences (contemporary processes) and evolutionary processes (historical constraints) interact to shape population differentiation, local adaptation, population persistence and biodiversity. To answers these questions I study the stream fauna of the Hawaiian Islands. Cumulatively, my research integrates: 1) population genetics and genomics to access neutral and non-neutral components of population connectivity; 2) lab and field experiments to derive relationships along the form-function-fitness axis; 3) computer modeling and simulation to study evolutionary and ecological processes that are analytically or empirically difficult to measure; and 4) citizen-driven science outreach for conservation of at-risk species. By taking a holistic approach, I can better identify locally adapted populations and the processes affecting their persistence and preservation.
EVOLUTIONARY MECHANISMS OF ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE
1. Local adaptation despite high gene flow.
For organisms like amphidromous fishes that change habitats during their life history, the balance between selection and migration can shift through ontogeny, making the likelihood of local adaptation difficult to predict. In Hawaiian waterfall-climbing gobies, it has been hypothesized that larval mixing during ocean dispersal counters local adaptation to contrasting topographic features of streams, like slope gradient, that can select for predator avoidance or climbing ability in juvenile recruits. To test this hypothesis I used morphological traits and neutral genetic markers to compare phenotypic and genotypic distributions in recruiting juveniles and adult subpopulations of the waterfall-climbing amphidromous goby, Sicyopterus stimpsoni. Morphological divergence between streams was present in both juvenile recruits and adult subpopulations, and was correlated with the steepness of the streams’ slope, a factor that influences the local selective environment. Spatially and temporally neutral genetic divergence was found only in juvenile recruits and was positively correlated with morphological divergence. These results suggest that temporal and spatial variation in recruiting cohorts with strong post-settlement selection on juveniles provides the opportunity for morphological adaptation to local stream environments. This work demonstrates the balance between migration and natural selection, which may impede speciation in the sea and may further explain why marine adaptive radiations are rare in Hawai‘i (Moody et al. 2015; see Wainwright 2015 MEC New and Views Perspective).
2. Opportunity for selection: the shape of fitness landscapes.
Natural selection is an important driver of adaptive evolution, but contrasting environmental pressures may lead to trade-offs between phenotypes that confer different performances and thus weaken the strength of selection and/or generate complex fitness surfaces with multiple local optima corresponding to different selection regimes. I evaluated how differences in patterns of phenotypic selection might promote morphological differences between subpopulations of the amphidromous Hawaiian waterfall-climbing goby, Sicyopterus stimpsoni. Collaborators and I conducted laboratory experiments to compare linear and nonlinear selection and the opportunity for selection in fish from Kaua‘i and the Big Island (Hawai‘i) due to the contrasting pressures of predator evasion and waterfall climbing which vary in disparity between the islands. Selection was strongest when individuals were exposed to their primary selective pressures (predator evasion on Kaua‘i and waterfall climbing on the Big Island). However, the opportunity for selection was greater on Kaua‘i for climbing and greater on the Big Island for predation. Canonical rotation analyses demonstrated that individuals from Kaua‘i and the Big Island occupy regions near their local fitness peaks for some traits. Therefore, selection for predation on Kaua‘i and climbing on the Big Island may not be as effective in promoting morphological changes in this endemic species, because variation of functionally important traits in their respective environments may have been reduced by directional or stabilizing selection. These results demonstrate that despite the constraints on the opportunities for selection, population differences in phenotypic traits can arise due to differences in selective regimes. (Moody, Kawano et al. 2017)
3. Connectivity matters: Linking genomics, oceanography and ecology to understand adaptation.
Deciphering ecological and evolutionary factors that contribute to population divergence has been challenging in marine species, which oftentimes have low levels of population differentiation. However, environmental variables such as oceanic currents and post-settlement habitat differences can reduce gene flow resulting in fine-scale genetic structure, particularly at loci under selection. I analyzed population structure of S. stimpsoni across the Hawaiian archipelago by combing genomics with oceanographic models of passive larval dispersal and individuals-based models of natural selection (Moody et al. in prep) to examine how migration and selection interact to shape population connectivity and local adaptation.
4.Trade-offs between natural and sexual selection shaping adaptation.
Juvenile S. stimpsoni exhibit phenotypic divergence correlated with exposure to different predominant pressures across their range. However, phenotypic divergence is reduced among adults from these localities, potentially because the removal of predators and the onset of sexual selection make selection pressures more similar across streams for adults than for juveniles. To test if ontogenetic erosion of phenotypic divergence is related to temporal changes in selection, collaborators and I will test how body shape affects predator escape response and matting success in S. stimpsoni. Clarifying how morphological variation impacts the performance for age-appropriate functions will elucidate which factors contribute to, and restrict, phenotypic divergence.
DEMOGRAPHY AND ADAPTIVE POTENTIAL
1. Modeling ecological dynamics of population persistence.
Major concerns in island systems are how do climate change, land use practices and invasive species introductions affect native flora and fauna. Stream fishes in particular are sensitive to, and highly impacted by all three of these influences in the Hawaiian Islands. In order to examine the impacts of habitat alteration and invasive species, collaborators and I are conducting large-scale mark-recapture studies of ‘o’opu nākea and invasive species removal experiments across 12 watersheds on O‘ahu. Does removal of invasive species illicit an ecological, genomic, and/or evolutionary response in the native fauna that can be sustained through space and time? I am using genomics to understand how the present/absence of invasive species influences life history strategies, ecological and evolutionary processes, and population dynamics.
2. Mapping the invisible: Advancing conservation of rare aquatic species through eDNA.
Estimating the distribution and abundance of threatened and endangered (T&E) aquatic species is often challenging, especially for rare species that inhabit remote areas with inaccessible terrain. Unreliable estimates derived from questionable or problematic survey methods can create debate over endangered species designations, which can impede conservation efforts. The analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) is a potentially powerful and non-intrusive approach that could transform assessments of T&E species in aquatic environments. The eleven endemic and culturally important freshwater species of the Hawaiian Islands and all under State protection, one is listed as Federally Threatened, and another was the focus on a failed proposal for federal protection that has deterred further listing attempts. Despite 50+ years of field surveys, the distribution and abundance of all eleven species remains unclear, including on islands like O‘ahu where some species are thought to be extirpated. As a collaboration, I will conduct the first eDNA study, coupled with citizen science, to examine the range-wide distribution and abundance for the entire endemic and invasive communities of Hawaiian streams.
G, E, OR GXE? | UNDERSTANDING DISPERSAL ABILITIES IN FRUIT FLIES
Organisms disperse to find and exploit resources, potential mates, or escape from predation. However, dispersal capabilites are limited (inherit ability) or restricted (evironmental limits). What factors infuence dispersal capabilities in Drosophila melanogaster? Fecundity in D. melanogaster is an easily quantifiable trait which can be varied by producing crosses from known genotypes/phenotypes parental lines and may have a negative consquence on dispersal capability. Females with greater fecundity may not be able to disperse far due to shear mass of the eggs. Therefore, a trade-off between dispersal and reproductive effort may limit dispersal capabilites in D. melanogaster. I reared progeny of different parental crosses and quantified ovariole number, a proxy for fecundity, to determine and make lines of different genotypes/phenotypes (low, medium, and high ovarial number). Marked progeny of each genotype with different colored fluorescent powder were released and recaptured in Appalachicola Forest, with a recapture rate of 5%. Results yielded a sex by environment (genotype) interaction. Females from the high genotype line had the smallest dispersal distance, but males from the high genotype line dispersed the farthest. Conversely, females from the low genotype line dispersed the farthest and males from the low genotype had the shortest dispersal. This suggests that a trade-off exists for females between dispersal and reproductive efforts, but males may allocate the energy, which would be used in females for egg production, into flight ability. I continued to work on this project after I graduated during my time as lab manager in Marta's lab. I conducted a second field experiment yielding similar results.